Well another winter is upon us. Another off-season of questions for the Franchise that has become NY's laughing stock: (no not the Jets) yes it's none other than the New York Metropolitans entering their 51st season.
While I personally as a Met fan try to remain optimistic it remains hard to be cheerful when your 2013 outfield around could consist of newly acquired Collin Cowgill/ or Mike Baxter, Kirk Nieuwenhuis, and Lucas Duda. Don't get me wrong I like our infield of D-Wright, Tejeda is a nice little hitter, Murphy at second base has vastly improved his defense (if you've seen any games last year you would know that), and at first Ike is a vacuum and though he may not hit over .265 most years in his future i can see him being a legitimate 30 home run 90 + RBI guy.
The issue remains here. Youth and inexperience. David Wright is the elder statesman of the position players on the ball club and he'll turn 30 tomorrow. Can a team filled with unproven young players with one perennial All-Star (Wright, that is) contend?
Here's Why they can:
1999 Mets Best "Infield Ever":
Olerud, Alfonzo, Ordonez, Ventura, and lets not forget to include in the infield Catcher: Mike Piazza.
Their Outfield that year:
a mixed bag; mainly including names like Agbayani, McRae, Cedeno, and an aging Rickey Henderson.
Final Record in 1999:
97-66, 2nd place in the NL East, NL Wild Card winners.
the next year, 2000, they would claim the Wild Card again and appear in their 1st world series in 14 years.
Overall, i'm not saying the 2013 Mets infield is the "Best Infield Ever 2.0" but I do think they have one of the better all-around infield's offensively in the NL East:
2012 STATS:
Wright .306, 21HR 93 RBI
Tejeda .289 26 doubles
Murphy .291 40 doubles
Davis 32 HR 90 RBI
Here's why they can't:
Collin Cowgill? Lucas Duda? Nieuwenhuis? Baxter?
A bullpen full of unprovens
A veteran Catcher, newly acquired John Buck has some pop but hits for a very low average and is a below-average defender
Prospect Catcher D'Arnaud??? Will he be as good as advertised? How about his Knee issues last season??
Bottom Line:
WE ARE IN NEW YORK. We want instant winners and have no patience. And as The San Francisco Giants have proved time and time again as 2 time champs in 3 years. You can have a great infield, outfield, or hit a ton of home runs (like the Yankees) but its always about PITCHING PITCHING PITCHING!
- WOODY
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Sunday, December 9, 2012
MMA
Superfight? Not Happening!
Were
you hoping to see Anderson Silva fight Georges St. Pierre or Jon “Bones”
Jones? Hate to disappoint you but
neither fight will happen. If you’re
like me, you are probably in denial and saying it will happen. But, the fact of the matter is there is too
much depth in their respective decisions to hold put their titles on hold. Don’t believe me? Just keep on reading.
Starting
with the Welterweight Division where Georges St. Pierre reigns. As you might’ve already heard, Nick Diaz is
getting the next title shot. That means
at least another 8 months to a year will go by before GSP is available to fight
Silva. But the next problem with that is
a fighter named Johnny Hendricks. He was
said to be the number one contender to the welterweight title before Dana White
in a business first decision named Nick Diaz as the next contender. Hendricks could possibly lose that spot after
Diaz in the mean time but with a five fight win streak and his dominating
performance over Kampmann in his last fight that doesn’t look likely. And if you are saying so what that’s only two
fights I hate to break it to you but there is also a revitalized Jon Fitch, the
soon to be back Carlos Condit, and up and comer Rory Macdonald.
Moving
onto the Middleweight Division and its champion, Anderson Silva. Anderson Silva is on a break as of right now,
so that puts the division on a little bit of a hold pattern but when he returns
there will be a plethora of challengers.
First up is “The Count” Michael Bisping assuming he beats Vitor Belfort
in his next fight which I believe he will.
I am not a fan of Bisping at all but you can’t disregard what he has
done in the Octagon. He has won five out
of his last six fights with that loss being very controversial to Chael
Sonnen. He has solid stand up and a good
ground game but I imagine that he will want to stand up with Silva and beat him
that way. After Bisping we have the
undefeated Chris Weidman. By time Silva
is ready to face Weidman he will be 100% healthy and in top form. Weidman has been very impressive winning his
first five fights in the octagon. After
him there a few more challengers waiting in the shadows such as Belcher,
Boetsch, and Rockhold who is the Strikeforce Middleweight Champion.
In
the Light Heavyweight Division Jon Jones has his hands full, but not with an
abundance of challengers but with very tough fights coming his way. Obviously, he needs to get past Chael Sonnen
first which shouldn’t be a problem at all.
So the real challenge will be after Sonnen in the form of Alexander
Gustafsson. I am predicting right now
that Gustafsson will be the one to take the belt away from Jones. This is the most intriguing fight to me right
now in that division. Both men fight
with a big reach advantage against their opponents and when they face each
other they will be even. But what I
think gives the edge to Gustafsson is his all around game. Jones is an excellent striker and wrestler
where as Gustafsson is a good striker who has been improving with a really good
ground game. After Gustafsson is Glover
Teixeira. He has been dominant in his
two UFC fights and is on a seventeen win fight streak overall and of those
seventeen victories, NONE of them have gone to a decision.
Unfortunately,
it does not look good for us fans at seeing a superfight with Anderson Silva
and either Jones or St. Pierre. But the
good news is either way we are going to be seeing some really good fights for
the belts. So start saving your money
now and get ready for a new champion or two.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
"All Day" All the Way
ALL DAY ALL THE WAY
The NFL season is nearing an end which means the talk for MVP starts up. The early favorites seem to be the consistent measure of perfection, Tom Brady, and the rejuvenated superstar, Peyton Manning. Manning has 30 touchdown passes, 10 interceptions, and 3,812 passing yards though 13 games, while Brady has 25 touchdowns, only 4 interceptions, and 3,537 through 12 games. Both well deserving I might add but in my eyes the MVP should be Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Petersen. He is the lead candidate for the Comeback Player of the Year Award but I don't think that's good enough. He is the leagues leading rusher with 1,446 yards with 4 games left to play.
A big factor in the Brady/Manning talk is not only their stats but they're on contending teams. While Minnesota has had nobody to rely on besides Adrian Petersen after the injury to All-Purpose stud Percy Harvin back in week 9. For those who make the valid argument about having the better record, i like to make the argument about better supporting cast which of the three Petersen falls short by a mile. Petersen is having an outstanding season posting 1,446 rushing yards, 8 touchdowns, 17 rushes of 20 yards or more, and 5 rushes of 40 yards or more. He has also posted career highs with 6.2 yards per carry and 120.5 yards per game. Posting these types of numbers is a milestone in itself but regarding the circumstances that Petersen dealt with it has been seen as a blessing. Petersen tore both his ACL and MCL last year on Christmas Eve. Most doctors did not think he would be available to suit up on opening day. But to no avail Petersen suited up and scored a touchdown in Minnesota's 26-23 win over Jacksonville.
With 4 games remaining on their schedule Petersen has potential to break the 2000 yard mark which has only been done 6 times in the history of the NFL and hasn't been seen since 2009 when Titan's RB Chris Johnson did it. However, in the year when Chris Johnson broke the 2K yard mark he lost the MVP to Peyton Manning. In the next 4 games he will face 3 defenses which rank in the Top 15 in the NFL including the Packers who he just ran for over 200 yards against. If Petersen can manage to break 2000 yards I think he should be a shoo in to win the MVP award. With the league transitioning from the era of ground and pound to the new era of pass heavy the chances we will see a rusher eclipse the 2000 yard mark will be more scarce then it has been in the past. In my opinion that is too big of an accomplishment to not be awarded with the MVP award.
-ACE
The NFL season is nearing an end which means the talk for MVP starts up. The early favorites seem to be the consistent measure of perfection, Tom Brady, and the rejuvenated superstar, Peyton Manning. Manning has 30 touchdown passes, 10 interceptions, and 3,812 passing yards though 13 games, while Brady has 25 touchdowns, only 4 interceptions, and 3,537 through 12 games. Both well deserving I might add but in my eyes the MVP should be Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Petersen. He is the lead candidate for the Comeback Player of the Year Award but I don't think that's good enough. He is the leagues leading rusher with 1,446 yards with 4 games left to play.
A big factor in the Brady/Manning talk is not only their stats but they're on contending teams. While Minnesota has had nobody to rely on besides Adrian Petersen after the injury to All-Purpose stud Percy Harvin back in week 9. For those who make the valid argument about having the better record, i like to make the argument about better supporting cast which of the three Petersen falls short by a mile. Petersen is having an outstanding season posting 1,446 rushing yards, 8 touchdowns, 17 rushes of 20 yards or more, and 5 rushes of 40 yards or more. He has also posted career highs with 6.2 yards per carry and 120.5 yards per game. Posting these types of numbers is a milestone in itself but regarding the circumstances that Petersen dealt with it has been seen as a blessing. Petersen tore both his ACL and MCL last year on Christmas Eve. Most doctors did not think he would be available to suit up on opening day. But to no avail Petersen suited up and scored a touchdown in Minnesota's 26-23 win over Jacksonville.
With 4 games remaining on their schedule Petersen has potential to break the 2000 yard mark which has only been done 6 times in the history of the NFL and hasn't been seen since 2009 when Titan's RB Chris Johnson did it. However, in the year when Chris Johnson broke the 2K yard mark he lost the MVP to Peyton Manning. In the next 4 games he will face 3 defenses which rank in the Top 15 in the NFL including the Packers who he just ran for over 200 yards against. If Petersen can manage to break 2000 yards I think he should be a shoo in to win the MVP award. With the league transitioning from the era of ground and pound to the new era of pass heavy the chances we will see a rusher eclipse the 2000 yard mark will be more scarce then it has been in the past. In my opinion that is too big of an accomplishment to not be awarded with the MVP award.
-ACE
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Election 2012
ELECTION
2012 BASEBALL STYLE
Well it’s that
time of the year again. Where the
baseball writers take out their pens and cast their ballots for the Hall of
Fame. And just like every year, there
are questions about who will get in, who should get in, and will Pete Rose ever
be inducted? Well, today’s blog is all
about that. Let’s start with the people
that will get in. Up first, Mike Piazza,
arguably the greatest hitting catcher of all time. With a career batting average over .300 and
427 home runs is a pretty safe bet to make the Hall. Secondly, Craig Biggio and no, not because he
was hit by 285 pitches. For me, over
3000 hits, and 291 home runs from mainly a second baseman gets you into the
Hall.
Now
for the players that should get inducted.
Lee Smith, 478 career saves.
Smith should have been inducted a long time ago (this is his 11th
year on the ballot) when he was the career saves leader and now sits third on
the list behind Hoffman and Rivera. Next
up with 254 career wins and over 3800 innings pitched, Jack Morris who was
close last year with 66.7% of the votes.
And lastly, my homer pick, Roger Clemens. Yea, yea, I hear all the steroid talk and
what not. But you know what? He wasn’t convicted with the fine Judicial System
we have set up in America. But to make
this argument more compelling, going strictly by his earned run averages, which
is really what makes people think he was on steroids, he was for the most part
pretty consistent. He had two phenomenal
years in Houston with another great year.
But also, let’s think about the fact that he was transitioning from the
AL East to the NL Central. Also, if we
are going to bring age into this, Bob Gibson was 32 when he had a 1.12 era, and
36 when he had a 2.46 era. So stop whining, Vote for Rocket.
Now
for my personal favorite topic, Pete Rose.
Is it really fair that we have people linked to steroids and actually
did take steroids on the ballot and not Pete Rose? If anything, Rose should be allowed on the
ballot to let the decision go to the baseball writer’s. I for one, think that the all time hits
leader should be in the hall of fame. So
he bet on baseball while managing the team, it doesn’t take away from him
getting 4256 hits in his career. I
personally think it would be worse to vote Barry Bonds into the Hall of Fame
rather than Rose. He did post a winning
percentage better than .500 as a manager and has very little involvement in
baseball since being banned. I think that has been punishment enough for
someone that loves the game.
In
conclusion, Piazza, Biggio, Smith, Morris, Clemens, and Rose should all be
inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.
-Stretch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)